Microsoft SESP Licensing – The reality

I read through all the Becta and Microsoft schpeil on their new licensing model (SESP) and how it is the best thing since sliced bread for education so I wanted to put it through its paces.

The first Edular I worked with refused point blank to quote me on SESP as it wasn’t in their system etc. They knew nothing about SESP – even its existence was a shock to them.

I went back to my MS licensing contact at Microsoft via Twitter and asked him if he had a recommendation on another Edular to try.. I also recommended he managed communication and training better with future education licensing models, he agreed.

The second Edular admitted they knew nothing but said they would investigate. A few days later after hearing nothing I rang them back to ask for an update, they sent me through a Select quote but not a SESP one so I emailed and rang back requesting SESP, 4 days later, still no quote….. On the 5th day I vented my frustration online and a third Edular (I didn’t know so many existed…) got in touch via twitter saying they can help and dropped me through ane email asking what I was looking for so I sent them an email with my requirements.

On the 7th day I was told by the Edular they were having some problems getting the actual pricing from Microsoft.

12 days later I still didn’t have a quote so I wrote a few tweets online which were picked up by some Microsoft people who then scurried away to ask the licensing team why Edulars couldn’t provide a quote.

14 days later I eventually have a price, thanks to Richard from Bechtle for all their hard work in helping me obtain these prices.

One of the things that’s different between Select and SESP if that you need to know the total amount of devices, amount of pupils and teachers inside of the school – as far as I’m aware with select licensing you just need machine count.

Lets compare the old vs the new pricing model

I have requested 2 pricing structures: Select & SESP.

For this experiment I’m supplying the Edular with machine and pupil counts for an average size 2 form entry Primary School in Bradford (480 pupils – 28 staff members) and requested the following licensing:

  • 2x server 2k8 standard licenses
  • 30x office 2k7 standard
  • 90x XP desktop cals

Basically in this model it works out at 5 pupils to 1 device. At this point in the article I think we should consider the value of this licensing prior to reading on to find out the actual costs..

Please take a few moments to think to yourself what you would pay for these licenses…

If you are like me you will want to pay about £30 per office license, £100 per server and £1 per CAL so a total of £1190. You will also take into consideration that in 3/5 years time your school may need to spend this level of money again to relicense newer versions.

With the SESP licensing you must annually renew each license.

The pricing I recieved was (rounded up/down):

£50 per standard server license

£13 per Office Enterprice license

£1.15 per CAL

So my total costs were:

£100 on servers per year

£390 on office per year

£103.5 on desktop cals

Total annual cost of a school licensing model (excluding any oem licenses) is £593.50.

These licenses include software assurance which is basically spin for receive the latest version free.

To summarize

Over a 5 year period schools under a SESP agreement will be paying £3,000 on licensing where as before they were paying between £1200-£1600.

Hopefully someone has made an error on pricing and I can update this article…

UPDATE: 06/12/2010  this article was never updated because MS sat on it and didn’t do jack ish.  They now have a new licensing model out.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Review of Microsoft Family Safety Installation

Today im reviewing Microsoft Family Safety with a consideration on e-Safety for parents

“With Family Safety, you decide how your kids experience the Internet. You can limit searches, block or allow websites, decide who your kids can communicate with when they’re using Windows Live Messenger, Hotmail, or Spaces and monitor what websites they’re visiting…”

In this review I will be installing the package and looking at what this really means in real life.

The product is easily downloadable from http://download.live.com/familysafety

Once you have downloaded and run the package you get this installer screen:

I was shocked to see Photo Gallery, Toolbar, Writer, some outlook and some Live Add ins bundled. Also SQL Server CE 3.1 is required and some of my applications will be updated.
For me this is bloatware already. I want an application that does what it sais in the blurb so I am going to remove all of the additional programs except from Family Safety (However you may want some of this functionality).
With everything else removed the install is a quite large 109 MB. I hope this disk space usage is justified.
I needed to close MSN messenger to proceed and the install process took 8 minutes to complete on a machine with with an Intel Core2 6600 & 2 GB ram.
Once install is complete you are presented with this screen:
I have already set my search provider to google safe search and my home page to Primary School Safe Search so I don’t want to do that. I also don’t want to help improve Windows Live, not right now.
Now for a restart… Microsoft never seemed to learn that this is the most frustrating thing about most of their products for IT professionals however parents might not mind this restart as much.
After the restart I was prompted to “Sign Up” to Windows live but I already have windows live so I clicked Close. Nothing has been placed on my desktop or start menu and Windows Live Messenger has not opened as it usualy does. Very bad first impression.
I had to browse to Start – Windows Live – Family Safety, here I tried to sign in as a parent using my hotmail/live username/password. I was given an Error That I have not yet ereviews the Windows Live Terms of Use. No link was provided. I logged into my hotmail to look for the Live Terms of Use.. I clicked More then Family Safety and then clicked “I accept”.
Then I clicked Sign in again, now im in. Already im convinced this is too complicated for parents.
I am going to leave it here for today, it has been 30 minutes so far and the install is done but the configuration isn’t.
In my opinion most parents would simply not go through this entire process as it is too complicated.
Part 2 of this post will review configuration. Expect it in a few days.

New Technology to protect pupils against e-mail abuse from sexual predators

The problem:

Pupils not gaining access to email at primary school due to safety concerns.

The current solution employed by many safety-conscious schools is to deny pupils’ the ability to send or receive emails to the outside world.  However, a survey of national schools revealed that “only 3% of UK schools have individual email accounts for all teaching staff and pupils in year 3 upwards.”   (CITATION) This is a surprisingly small percentage, considering e-mail is first introduced to the curriculum in year 3.

There are many cross-curricular benefits of allowing children to communicate effectively with other children, whether locally or globally.  The Global Gateway (www.globalgateway.org.uk )  is building a community of links between schools around the world and e-mail provides a cost-effective means of carrying the messages between pupils.

But it’s hard to build communities over the internet when the children have no way to contribute.  What if we let our children speak and listen freely?  There is a risk that children may be groomed by sexual predators or threatened by other children. 

Can we not filter e-mail in the same way we filter websites?

The solution:

A pioneering new hosted email service called Primary Email.  This service scans all emails to  determine if the recipient is a pupil or teacher and applies the following filters accordingly:

·         Detect phrases and key words for bullying or sexual predators

·         Detects curse words

·         Check email origin (location/ISP) for known high risk areas

·         Anti-spam and anti-virus

·         All emails are tagged with a reminder to pupils never to give out any private or personal information over email.

Email is scanned through the filters and if a potential threat is detected the system instantly sends a copy of the email to the school office notifying a member of staff of the risk.

To confirm a specific threat requires access to the pupil’s inbox.  This can be completed by a school admin/SLT member without the requirement of knowing any additional passwords or any training.

Now you have identified and confirmed a threat, what do you do now?  At this point you can work with various child protection agencies or use your current school child protection/e-safety policy to deal with the matter. 

Do we have a safe, accessible, stable email system that teachers and pupils actually want to use inside and outside of schools?  It certainly looks that way!  Testing since 2007 in the majority of Bradford schools and various nationwide schools shows an increased level of communication between all users, with email being used as a cross curricular tool accessible on a number of devices including iPhones, PDAs and UMPCs.  Next generation learning is also achieved through anytime/anywhere learning over the internet.

“Primary Email has allowed our school to confidently give all pupils 24/7 email access for the first time.  Our pupils use their PDAs at home to email back and forth between their friends and teacher.  It is an eye opener to see what the pupils sometimes email each other.  Previously when we taught email we never gave the pupils access to the internet however this did not increase learning, we now have an email system that is used frequently by all staff and pupils to communicate and learn.”

Sharon Dominic – Wilsden Primary School
2008 Hand Held Learning- Innovation in Primary winners

Primary Email is not just about safety; children are given interactive games to learn how to use email and staff are given access to a shared school diary which publishes via RSS to the Internet. This allows schools to easily populate a Learning Environment or Website.  Teachers are provided with distribution lists to email all the pupils in their class/school and distribution groups for governors/parents are available.  The email system automatically updates from the school MIS making management extremely easy. 

How and when can your school start using this new technology?  Now!  You can find out more information at http://primaryemail.co.uk, by emailing hello@primaryemail.co.uk or calling on 084566 80 90 95.

The system is currently limited to the English/British language however worldwide packs are currently in beta testing in various countries.  The French and Spanish packs are due in the last quarter of 2009.

The technical bits

The exciting part of this new technology is the sexual predator filtering.  There have been recent successes using similar techniques – See the below URL. http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/10/71948

Primary email uses two key systems to detect a threat.

The first is a database of key words/phrases used by predators/bullies, each of these words contains a certain weight of risk.

The second is similar to using sender profiling.  Primary Email checks for patterns that predators or bullies would use and likely sending domains that a predator would use to try to cover his/her tracks e.g. free email services.

To build the database of key words and phrases, several key strategic partners provided logs/conversations of sexual predators and their victims.  By identifying key phrases and words and assigning them a score per hit, Primary Email was able to build an algorithm to accomplish the detection process.  An example of this system working properly is that if the word “Pussy” is detected then it looks for “Cat”, in this scenario the risk level is reduced.  If the prior word is “Shaved” then the risk level is increased.  Initial testing showed that phrases could be disguised with foreign characters and abbreviation marks.  Tweaks were made to the system and this has led to approximately 98% accuracy in detecting potential risks.

The pupil protection system keeps a record of past conversations and senders.  This allows more stringent checks when one external account contacts more than one pupil, when one pupil is contacted by multiple external accounts or when a series of short emails are sent back and forth between pupils and external accounts.


 

Links

Primary Email – http://primaryemail.co.uk
Wilsden Primary School – http://www.wilsden.ngfl.ac.uk